The plane crash activity that our
class participated in demonstrated how quickly we all can think of ideas. It
also showed how efficient we were in working together and combining certain
ideas. During the activity, I realized that the main topic our group was
discussing about didn’t have to deal with the necessities of survival (fire,
shelter, food). Instead, government was the prime issue in our discussion.
I think my group had fairly
potential ideas about what we would all do on the island. The biggest strengths
about my group, overall, were our ability to quickly formulate ideas and how
well we could all agree on certain things. Emory was quick to bring up who
would be in charge of what, which led us to our main topic. Our weaknesses
were, in my opinion, we didn’t really think realistically. If I were on an
island with my classmates, I would first check to see if there were people
already inhabiting the area. Then I would see if there was a source of food or
shelter. I’d start a fire and try to survive the night. I’m not saying that
government is not realistic. I’m just stating that government is not realistic
in terms of basic survival when you first arrive stranded on an island.
I think my group would survive
based on our discussion in class. However, we would need to think about what is
most important first than other less important things. I think we would remain
alive. If we will work together efficiently on the island, we might have a
chance of survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment